We value your privacy
Essential cookies keep the site and your login working. With your consent we also use live chat, analytics and campaign measurement. You can change this at any time from “Cookie settings” in the footer. See our Cookie Policy.
AM1 takes fewer gold trades and exits on real-time volatility; AM2 takes many more trades with small fixed targets and tighter lot sizing. Both run in your own broker account, with the same weekly reporting.
The clearest way to understand AM1 and AM2 is to compare them directly.
| AM1 | AM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade frequency | Fewer trades | Many more trades |
| Take-profit logic | Set by real-time market volatility | Small, fixed gains per trade |
| Lot size (reference) | 0.01 lot per $1,000 | 0.01 lot per $2,000 |
| Reporting since | September 2025 | 1 November 2026 |
| Minimum entry | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| Price (new members) | £40/month | £40/month |
Reference figures, not targets or forecasts. Capital is at risk: both systems can lose money, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
AM1 takes fewer trades and lets each one run until real-time volatility conditions say it is time to close. It is the original Alpha Maverick system, and the one with the longest public track record.
AM2 takes a significantly higher number of trades than AM1, aiming for small gains each time. It has no profit target. Risk is managed against an event-based drawdown parameter rather than a weekly percentage. This is an internal operational parameter, not a guaranteed limit: it does not cap your loss, and gaps, slippage and broker conditions can produce losses beyond it.
Running AM1 and AM2 at the same time requires a broker account of $6,000 or more, which covers both minimums ($2,000 for AM1 and $4,000 for AM2), priced as a single combined subscription. The comparison above sets out how the two differ. AlphaMaverick does not select a strategy for you and does not assess which is suitable for your circumstances: that decision is yours.